What is the purpose of this bill? It creates a liability for instructors, in that their CHLs may be suspended if they fail to do something in a timely fashion. The question is who needs to know that they are instructors and for what purpose? If someone is willing to propose that the privileges that are extended to the other folk on the list are extended to CHL instructors, then Im all for it, but thats not the case.
We mark our students sheets with PASS or FAIL because there is potential liability for passing at either a very high or very low level (of the passing range). Are instructors going to be held to a different standard in their exercise of CHL. If there is any advantage, the instructor or his/her attorney can document the status at a later time.
Apart from our role in the teaching and certification process, our CHLs are no different from anyone else's. Should they be?? I need some convincing.